|
UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization, has been working to build a socialist world government since
its founding. As "The Saturday Review" editorialized in 1952, "If UNESCO
is attacked on the grounds that it is helping to prepare the world's peoples
for world government, then it is an error to burst forth with apologetic
statements and denials. Let us face it: the job of UNESCO is to help create
and promote the elements of world citizenship. When faced with such a
'charge,' let us by all means affirm it from the housetops."
As part of its efforts to build world government, by 1984 UNESCO
was openly promoting the "New World Information Order." This proposal
would allow only UN-licensed journalists, broadcasters and the like to work
at their profession, and would have regulated what could be published. The
proposal was regarded as so contrary to American constitutional principles
that the US withdrew from membership in UNESCO.
Now, at the instigation of President Bush, our government is on the
verge of rejoining the organization. According to Bush and other UN
boosters, UNESCO has "reformed" and is now worthy of American support.
Just how true is that claim? If anything, the situation is worse than it was in
1984.
For now at least, the New World Information Order has been
withdrawn. Other outrageous policies have been added. For example,
UNESCO promotes abortion worldwide, supporting even the murderous
one-child policy of the Peoples Republic of China. After the birth of a first
child, the PRC forces many mothers to abort any subsequent children. In
addition to the abortions themselves, the policy results in outright infanticide
as many parents kill their baby girls until they succeed in delivering a boy.
UNESCO also has been appropriating "World Heritage Sites" in the
US and other countries. They now consider even Yellowstone National Park
and numerous other American sites to be in some sense the property of the
UN. The federal government has used World Heritage Site designation to
justify increased federal regulation of some sites, in response to international
pressure. This illustrates the serious danger that UNESCO poses to our
national sovereignty.
Perhaps the most worrisome recent actions of UNESCO are its
attempts to promote its Earth Charter. The charter contains a list of
environmental and other politically correct pronouncements called the
Sixteen Principles, touted by former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev and
others as the replacement for the Ten Commandments. A copy of the charter
is being venerated by supporters in city after city in the so-called Arc of
Hope, a box that bears a strong resemblance to the sacred Arc of the
Covenant.
As part of its program to popularize the Earth Charter, UNESCO has
proposed school curricula designed to counteract the religious and political
influence of parents. Most of us American parents are just too Christian and
patriotic to suit UNESCO, so we can't be allowed to ruin the next generation
of children by teaching them our outmoded principles.
It seems clear that UNESCO has not "reformed" itself in a way that
would make most Americans want to be associated with it. Yet our president
and Congress have set in motion the process to rejoin the organization.
Rep. Ron Paul (R. Texas) and others have been working to amend HR
1950 (the Foreign Relations Authorization Act) to prevent our rejoining
UNESCO. Those of us who agree that UNESCO is dangerous and unsavory
should ask our representatives to support Rep. Paul's amendment.
|